[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [RFH] The need for signed packages and signed Releases (long, long)



> RTFM!!!

My point, which you missed, was that the AT-approved
solution would be more adequate if it were integrated
into the tools.  Currently, it's a bit of sample bash
code.  ( http://people.debian.org/~ajt/apt-check-sigs .)

> I'm surprised at the amount of people that don't read
> the mails throughly and comment on issues that have
> been beaten to death before.

Yes, it's a shame that not everyone is omniscient, or
even polite for that matter.

-- 
Thomas Hood




Reply to: