On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 09:41:29AM +0100, Javier Fern?ndez-Sanguino Pe?a wrote: > Nice to see that some packages which were marked REMOVED have their bugs > now fixed (even if in NMUs) Nice to see people getting all aggressive about it too. > On Fri, Nov 15, 2002 at 06:21:22PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > purged by RM; see bug 139659 > I sent a new version of the package (targeted for contrib/ since the > package needs non-free software to compile) which was sent november 5th. I > received a "ldp-es_20021105-1_i386.changes is NEW" that same day. Yes, and it's still in queue/new awaiting processing. It's delayed since there seems to be some issue about its DFSG-freeness. > This package fixed both bug 139659 and some others, however, I cannot > currently find it in 'incoming'. It seems that both the old package and > any instances of uploads have been removed completely. You're looking in the wrong place. See /org/ftp.debian.org/queue/new/. > And when I finally sent a new package removing the non-free bits and > fixing the bug I see it has been removed from the archive... Packages have to be removed from main before they can be accepted into contrib anyway. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''
Attachment:
pgpKoq7M3CPuS.pgp
Description: PGP signature