Re: Free bigot flame burning, time to think.
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 10:12:10AM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 05:57:36PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 07:41:02AM -0800, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> > > I can live with some tighter restrictions:
> > > (a) non-free with serious bug should be removed from unstable/testing
> > > unless it is fixed in 1 year.
> > ^^^^^^
> > Are you serious?
> Right now, it looks almost infinite to me without rules. It stays there
> until AJ has time to review.
So, uh, how about *you* spending some time reviewing it? Or the other
RC bugs?
In an ideal world, I'd rather "1 month" be viewed as an excessive amount
of time, for packages in main, as well as non-free. Unfortunately there
are too many such packages at the moment, and I need some way of breaking
up the job.
> With rules as this, this process can be automated.
I don't think this is ever a good idea.
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''
Reply to: