Re: [RFH] The need for signed packages and signed Releases (long, long)
On Thu, Nov 14, 2002 at 09:08:08AM +0100, Thomas Hood wrote:
> Anthony Towns wrote:
> > I've trained myself to type `apt-check-sigs' after
> > ever `apt-get update'.
> # apt-check-sigs
> bash: apt-check-sigs: command not found
> I don't find this command anywhere in the package archive.
google can find it though. google rocks. Surely you know this by now?
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''
Reply to: