[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Discussion - non-free software removal



On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 06:15:21PM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote:
> our mirror
> operators have an obligation to carry whatever we want to have them
> carry; 

non-free is one of the easiest things for mirror operators to drop,
if they want. All they need to exclude (essentially) is pool/non-free
from the mirror scripts. (pool/non-US/non-free if they mirror non-US,
dists/*/non-free, if they want to be thorough and not have confused users)

This is much easier than not mirroring some specific architectures
(like GNU/Hurd), or not mirroring some specific suites (like potato,
unstable and experimental).

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

 ``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''

Attachment: pgpjmDo0bVX28.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: