Re: Some odd idea on /etc/modules

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Some odd idea on /etc/modules
From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 11:31:59 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 20021112163159.GK16954@apocalypse.deadbeast.net>
Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 010601c194a4$f4a7f580$1401a8c0@nodelander>
References: <[🔎] 010601c194a4$f4a7f580$1401a8c0@nodelander>

	Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 23:21:14 +0100

/me checks the calendar and scratches his head

	X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4920.2300

Ah, that explains it.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson                |      We either learn from history or,
Debian GNU/Linux                   |      uh, well, something bad will
branden@debian.org                 |      happen.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |      -- Bob Church

Attachment: pgpWsHvVOdz06.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to:

References:
- Some odd idea on /etc/modules
  - From: "Joris Lambrecht" <joris.lambrecht@pandora.be>

Prev by Date: Re: [RFH] The need for signed packages and signed Releases (long, long)
Next by Date: Re: Migration of non-free packages to testing
Previous by thread: Re: Some odd idea on /etc/modules
Next by thread: [RFH] The need for signed packages and signed Releases (long, long)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread