Re: Should libgnomeprint-data use defoma?

To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Should libgnomeprint-data use defoma?
From: Colin Walters <walters@debian.org>
Date: 07 Nov 2002 22:22:18 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 1036725738.10448.21.camel@space-ghost>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20021107225735.GA30959@ghanima.endorphin.org>
References: <[🔎] 20021107225735.GA30959@ghanima.endorphin.org>

On Thu, 2002-11-07 at 17:57, Fruhwirth Clemens wrote:

> What does the rest of the Debian crew think? Should Defoma integration
> become part of the Debian policy?

With fontconfig on the way, I think now would be a bad time to mandate
defoma.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Should libgnomeprint-data use defoma?
  - From: Graham Wilson <bob@decoy.wox.org>

References:
- Should libgnomeprint-data use defoma?
  - From: Fruhwirth Clemens <clemens-dated-1037141856.1939@endorphin.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#168236: ITP: cl-ftp -- Common Lisp FTP library
Next by Date: Bug#168240: ITP: cvs-syncmail -- notification program for CVS checkins
Previous by thread: Should libgnomeprint-data use defoma?
Next by thread: Re: Should libgnomeprint-data use defoma?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread