[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Debian versioning scheme (r1 vs .1)



On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 12:55:47PM +0100, Emile van Bergen wrote:
> > We shouldn't release 4.0, we should release 4. And the next one should
> > be 5, and then 6. The minor number is absolutely meaningless and should

> This may have no meaning for computers, but it may have for humans
> ("Let's see now, Debian has released a version with a new major number,
> there should be quite some changes. I'm curious, maybe I should give it
> another try").

If Sun can have it booth ways (ie. 2.8 = 8), we can too. And then everyone's
happy, right?

-- 
Peter Mathiasson, peter at mathiasson dot nu, http://www.mathiasson.nu
GPG Fingerprint: A9A7 F8F6 9821 F415 B066 77F1 7FF5 C2E6 7BF2 F228

Attachment: pgpWnT1skSyIx.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: