At Thu, 31 Oct 2002 20:51:21 +0100, Simon Richter wrote: > That is a workaround, specifically *the* workaround we're talking about. > It is definitely not a bug in itself (that's why I didn't list it as a > bug) and no real solution either (because it makes the package useless > for the people who need it, it just avoids breakage in other packages). This is a bug in itself, when something Provides something and it is not a direct replacement. regards, junichi