On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 03:28:42AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Mon, Oct 21, 2002 at 09:19:26PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > > The RC bug list is back up at > > http://bugs.debian.org/release-critical/ > > Those of you who didn't sense the malicious subtext of the above, > may wish to have another look at that URL fairly soon. In particular, > a large number of effectively unmaintained packages on that list have > been marked for removal. Don't bother mailing me about such packages, > just fix the bugs. If you need help fixing the bugs, ask around in the > usual places -- debian-devel@lists.d.o, debian-qa@lists.d.o or IRC. One question: Are NMUs appropiate for some packages without following the Dev-policy (if we do then the time will run out and this packages will be removed). I'm thinking of doing NMUs of: - doc-iana, #13492 seems pretty simple to fix - doc-linux-sv, same for #140137 - doc-rfc, ditto for #133563 and all agree that to fix #92810 we would need to send the package to non-free. - doc-rfc-std, ditto for #111218 Is it ok? Javi PS: Of course you could tell me to go and fix *my* bugs, but they are not so simple to fix (at least not all of them :)
Attachment:
pgp6t5xO0WvtV.pgp
Description: PGP signature