[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bad signature, was: Re: Need a stable NMU'er please ...

On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 02:12:49PM -0400, Elie Rosenblum wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 06:11:51PM +0200, Oliver Kurth wrote:
> > Hi!
> > 
> > Does anyone else get this?
> > 
> > [-- PGP output follows (current time: Tue Oct 22 18:10:26 2002) --]
> > gpg: Signature made Tue Oct 22 17:49:23 2002 CEST using RSA key ID 
> > 4B7C223D
> > gpg: BAD signature from "Elie Rosenblum <fnord@debian.org>"
> > [-- End of PGP output --]
> Hmm. I'm using pgp2.rc in mutt. In my own mailer I get:
> Good signature from user "Elie Rosenblum <fnord@debian.org>".                                       
> Signature made 2002/10/22 15:49 GMT using 2047-bit key, key ID 4B7C223D                             
> This is the same key with which I sign my uploads, and I've never had
> a problem with those being accepted.

But there certainly is a problem. I get the same error with gnupg from 
sid and from woody, using mutt in both cases. The others that get the 
error use mutt or Evolution.

I got your key from wwwkeys.de.pgp.net, but the key from 
keyring.debian.org is the same. Are we talking about the same key? Your 
fingerprint seems to be:

$ gpg --fingerprint 4B7C223D
pub  2047R/4B7C223D 1997-04-28 Elie Rosenblum <fnord@debian.org>
     Key fingerprint = B5 D5 EA ED 77 ED 1D 24  21 F9 BF 8A 60 68 D6 34
uid                            Elie Rosenblum <erosenbl@nyx.net>

gpg signing is not worth anything if we do not investigate this problem.

Does anyone _not_ get 'BAD signature' for Elie's mails?

debian/rules                                       http://zork.net/~nick/srom/

Attachment: pgp2VEAdGO0hs.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: