[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Renaming of automake to automake1.4

Wow, the last thing I expected was people to have a problem with the
name :) Well I'm open to other suggestions if necessary. I think its a
good virtual package name in that it almost certainly won't conflict
with any actual package's name.

* Richard Braakman (dark@xs4all.nl) wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2002 at 05:37:54PM -0400, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > All the automake packages will provide the virtual package
> > automaken (in the same spirit as emacsen) if you need to depend on any
> > version of automake. 
> I don't understand how you get "automaken".  emacs -> emacsen is a
> parallel to ox -> oxen.  I don't think English has any "-ake" words
> that become "-aken" in the plural.
> There is a possible parallel with "take" -> "taken", but that would
> make automaken an adjective.  ("This package is automaken, but it
> doesn't work with the latest version.")
> Is that what you mean?
> Richard Braakman

Eric Dorland <dorland@lords.com>
ICQ: #61138586, Jabber: hooty@jabber.com
1024D/16D970C6 097C 4861 9934 27A0 8E1C  2B0A 61E9 8ECF 16D9 70C6

Version: 3.12
GCS d- s++: a-- C+++ UL+++ P++ L++ E++ W++ N+ o K- w+ 
O? M++ V-- PS+ PE Y+ PGP++ t++ 5++ X+ R tv++ b+++ DI+ D+ 
G e h! r- y+ 

Attachment: pgphZh3s2j7Fo.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: