Re: When not to close a bug in a changelog...
Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org> immo vero scripsit:
> > Alternatively, if you include some of the changes from the NMU and
> > revert others, you should document *that*, not waste bits talking about
> > changes that aren't. IOW, the assumption should be that changes are
> > carried forward, unless it specifically says that they aren't.
>
> This assumes that the maintainer has seen the nmu get done, and has then gone
> the extra step(s) of fetching the source from the archive.
or, (that you didn't mention)
the maintainer applied the NMU-patch from the BTS.
regards,
junichi
--
dancer@debian.org : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
Libpkg-guide: http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer/column/libpkg-guide/
Reply to: