Re: Mass bugfiling potential: 'rules' with space
>>"Branden" == Branden Robinson <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
Branden> Also, one way to mitigate a glut of bug reports might be to
Branden> break it up a little bit. For instance, spread the process
Branden> out over 5 weeks or so, re-running the scan each time so you
Branden> don't file bugs that have already been fixed:
Son instead of being annoye once by a mass of bug reports,
people can be annoyed periodically at a rapid frequency as their
packages at different priorities are hit?
I fail to see how breaking up a mass bug filing artificially
in any way ameliorates any offence the mass filing may cause. Indeed,
if you think that this works, I'll merely write up a scriupt that
delays X units of time to file mass bug reports -- say, evey 6 hours
or so, some bugs shall be sent.
The spirit, not the letter, of the objections to mass bug
filing ought to be looked at.
Build a system that even a fool can use and only a fool will want to
Manoj Srivastava <email@example.com> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C