Re: Bug#164000: ITP: xmltoman -- simple XML to man converter
Previously Oliver Kurth wrote:
> I did not look thoroughly at the other xml to man converters, but IMHO
> they have way too much overhead. My scripts are 3K each, and depend on
> perl and libxml-parser-perl only.
For extra geek points, why not do it using just XSLT?
/firstname.lastname@example.org This space intentionally left occupied \
| email@example.com http://www.wiggy.net/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |