On Tue, Oct 01, 2002 at 11:34:21AM +1000, Brian May wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 02:30:36AM -0400, Joseph Fannin wrote:
> > I've used this backend before -- it works well for me. People
> > with higher standards than me might have something to say about the
> > image quality that I miss, but it works. The patch against the SANE
> > source tree seems minimally invasive at a glance.
>
> Strange. I heard reports on debian-user that results were poor,
> the colors were badly distorted or something.
I guess it's possible I've missed this -- I'm a little color
blind. It's still better than nothing.
> Does the kernel source still need to be changed for it to work?
Not since very early 2.4, maybe 2.4-testX.
--
Joseph Fannin
jhf@rivenstone.net
"Anyone who quotes me in their sig is an idiot." -- Rusty Russell.
Attachment:
pgppWmcy1TJQX.pgp
Description: PGP signature