Bug#161849: general: many packages still depend on textutils|shellutils|fileutils
On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 10:22:56PM -0400, Michael Stone wrote:
> Actually, packages should *not* normally depend on coreutils, as it is
> in base.
s/in base/marked as Essential: yes/ (pedantic yes, but just in case this
is someone's first introduction to the concept...)
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''
Reply to: