On Mon, 2002-09-16 at 07:17, Anthony Towns wrote: > It'd also mean that > essentially nothing would ever be autobuilt with the new glibc's until > we did a release, which would seem a bit risky, for non-i386 arches. Wouldn't things get autobuilt against the new glibc once that glibc moved to testing? But then again, if *that* ever happened, we wouldn't be talking about how horribly broken testing is ;-) [ Seriously, isn't this whole mess about glibc, now on day one of five? ]
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part