Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> properly. (It always seem like a lot of people get confused and they
> incorrectly think that (a) proper use of Wpoison will cause the legiti-
> mate search engines to avoid any web site that uses Wpoison.. which is
> just plain false, and/or that (b) Wpoison will cause some innocent
> people to be spammed... which is EXTREMELY unlikely.)
Extremely unlikely or not, I have had at least one email address which
is received by me be demonstratably generated by this kind of tool[1]. I
don't know if I've received spam on it; I don't archive all my spam.
But then anti-spam people have never been very concerned about
collateral damage anyway.
--
see shy jo
[1] The @mooix.net address at
http://www.cobwebsite.freewire.co.uk/antispam1.html
Attachment:
pgpBYIHvGjqLr.pgp
Description: PGP signature