Re: wanting to package wpoison
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> Now I'm confused.
> Were you attempting to make a case in favor of _binary_ distribution
> of add-on packages?
> If so, you just did the exact opposite.
> I think you just made the case for why distribution of sources is better.
> (And in case it wasn't clear, that what the Wpoison copyright conditions
> called for anyway.)
My apologies then, I misunderstood what your side was. My case was for
source distribution. Debian autobuilds binaries from the source, for each
architecture. Change the source, the binary is autobuilt for each arch.