Re: wanting to package wpoison
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
> Now I'm confused.
>
> Were you attempting to make a case in favor of _binary_ distribution
> of add-on packages?
>
> If so, you just did the exact opposite.
>
> I think you just made the case for why distribution of sources is better.
> (And in case it wasn't clear, that what the Wpoison copyright conditions
> called for anyway.)
My apologies then, I misunderstood what your side was. My case was for
source distribution. Debian autobuilds binaries from the source, for each
architecture. Change the source, the binary is autobuilt for each arch.
Reply to: