Re: [RFD] optimized versions of openssl
On Sat, 2002-09-07 at 03:31, Christoph Martin wrote:
> putting them all in the same package make the package somewhat bigger,
> but makes it easier for the installer to configure the correct
> setup. The second solution safes some disk space, but depends on the
> user the install the optimized libraries herself.
If you're just providing two or three versions, I don't think an extra
200k per optimized library can be viewed as a big deal. By the time
sarge is released, it will matter even less (if that's possible).