W liście z czw, 22-08-2002, godz. 11:58, James Troup pisze: > Grzegorz Prokopski <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes: > > > * note to ftpmaster: if you have some other technical problems with > > this package - please file a bugreport or just mail me; I'll > > explain/fix remaining isses ASAP; rejecting the package worries me > > and I am afraid if it won't make it waiting another week for > > acceptance. thank you for your understanding > > *sigh* being like this in the changelog is extremely > counter-productive, you might want to think about that next time you > wonder "why am I waiting for <foo>?"... I hope, that this is NOT the reason why updated sablevm package is being kept out of the archive since about 2 weeks? My english is too weak to say how and why I'd be disappointed if ftpmasters were keeping my package away from the archive as a penalty because of my changelog note (see the "please" there?). Summarizing: please just let new sablevm package into the archive Regards Grzegorz B. Prokopski PS: Cc:ing d-d beacuase I feel the need to :-/ I don't want to have "FireBird deja vu" (FB waited for months for inclusion w/o any notoice and didn't make it into Woody) with SableVM.
Description: PGP signature