[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Apache2



Are there any plans for php support for apache2?  I've played around w/
2.0.40 and a php cvs snapshot from sometime last week, w/ good results;
I'm looking forward to a php4-snapshot/php4-apache2 packages, or
something along those lines.


On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 04:35:13PM +0100, Thom May wrote:
> 
> * Matt Kern (matt.kern@undue.org) wrote :
> > I have just installed apache2 (out of sid onto a woody based system)
> > and am having a little trouble understanding the new methodology.
> > 
> > I can see the advantages of all the separate configuration
> > directories, but cannot see quite how everything fits together.  I
> > understand the include mechanism and most of the files under
> > /etc/apache2, but where are the referred to binaries addhost,
> > ap2addhost and a2enhost (or whatever they are called in the files and
> > postings I have read)?  I can't find anything on my system that makes
> > use of the *.d directories in /etc/vhost.
> > 
> > Have I caught the apache2 package in a state of extreme development?
> 
> No, you've caught the vhost system in a state of extreme unworkingness -
> there was a very rough version that maybe worked a while back, but it
> seriously needs a rewrite and some love.
> 
> It is however entirely workable without vhost-base; add sites and modules to
> /etc/apache2/{sites,mods}-available, and enable them with a symlink into
> /etc/apache2/{sites,mods}-enabled 
> 
> 
> A more suitable list for further discussion is debian-apache, and the
> reply-to is set accordingly.
> -Thom
> 
> -- 
> Thom May -> thom@debian.org
> 
> <spectra> Hello!
> <spectra> What is the voting period? From Mar 24th until?
> <asuffield> until the candidate manoj wants to win is in the lead
> * asuffield ducks into the icbm shelter
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> 

-- 
Broad surveillance is a mark of bad security.
	-- Bruce Schneier



Reply to: