Re: lilo: bad changelog entry violates Social Contract
Russell Coker <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Aug 2002 20:01, Daniel Burrows wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 06, 2002 at 06:28:30PM +0200, Russell Coker
> <email@example.com> was heard to say:
>>> On Tue, 6 Aug 2002 17:11, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>>>> It is useful to explain the change which closed the bug, regardless of
>>>> whether it was made by the Debian maintainer or the upstream
>>>> maintainer. It is a Debian bug, and it should be closed with an
>>>> explanation as to how it was fixed.
>>> In which case the upload would never have occurred and the bug would
>>> still be open.
>>> I have not had time to look into this issue to determine exactly what was
>>> done to fix it.
>> You don't have time to write something like this?
> I have time to write that, but not what Matt requested.
>> * New upstream version
>> - Hiding/unhiding and activating/deactivating partitions works again
>> (Closes: #136757)
I can only speak for myself, but I would be completely satisfied with
this changelog-entry, and _I think_ most people in this thread who
spoke up and didn't like the original one would be, too.
thanks for your work, cu andreas