[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [hertzog@debian.org: Re: Woody retrospective and Sarge introspective]

Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org> writes:

> Yes, we'd need more autobuilders (or reconfiguring the one we have),
> we did it for the security team, we can do it for "candidate".

*giggle* 'we'?  Is that the royal we or were you working on the
security/buildd infrastructure while I didn't notice?  If it's not the
latter, you might want to be a little less free with your assertions
about what is and isn't going to happen with the autobuilders...

> I don't see that it would be more problematic than unstable or
> testing wrt security updates.

*giggle* (again); let's see, the security team seem to have
jack-the-groove interest in supporting testing, never mind
unstable... so what makes you think they're going to jump to support
yet another distribution?


Reply to: