Re: Bug#154714: not declared dependency on libvorbisfile
- To: debian-devel@lists.debian.org
- Cc: "Christian T. Steigies" <cts@debian.org>, Eduard Bloch <blade@debian.org>, 154714@bugs.debian.org, 154704@bugs.debian.org, 154680@bugs.debian.org, Christopher L Cheney <ccheney@debian.org>
- Subject: Re: Bug#154714: not declared dependency on libvorbisfile
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2002 13:28:05 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20020729182804.GG1858@netexpress.net>
- Mail-followup-to: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, "Christian T. Steigies" <cts@debian.org>, Eduard Bloch <blade@debian.org>, 154714@bugs.debian.org, 154704@bugs.debian.org, 154680@bugs.debian.org, Christopher L Cheney <ccheney@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20020729182005.GE856@pelks01.extern.uni-tuebingen.de>
- References: <E17ZB2f-0001dx-00@zombie> <[🔎] 20020729094026.A29806@debian.org> <[🔎] 20020729153854.GA26312@cheney.cx> <[🔎] 20020729105100.B14193@debian.org> <[🔎] 20020729182005.GE856@pelks01.extern.uni-tuebingen.de>
On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 08:20:05PM +0200, Daniel Kobras wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2002 at 10:51:00AM -0500, Christian T. Steigies wrote:
> > That would be nice. Now if somebody positively confirms that I break nothing
> > by building sdl-mixer with vorbis 1.0.0, I make it depend on the new vorbis.
> > But even with the old libvorbisfile, I would have to rebuild sdl-mixer to
> > depend on that? Oh my...
> Building sdl-mixer with vorbis 1.0.0 means linking the lib to a library
> with different soname. Means you ought to change libsdl-mixer's soname
> as well.
In a world where insane cascading effects are considered desirable in
library packages, sure...
Such changes are only necessary when a binary references a library both
directly and indirectly (foo-util needs libfoo, libbar; libfoo needs
libbar). Such changes are never necessary when the multiply-referenced
library uses versioned symbols.
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
Attachment:
pgpn3AGVdERQi.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Reply to: