[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Accepted sdl-image1.2 1.2.2-1 (i386 source)

On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 11:20:10AM -0400, Daniel Burrows wrote:
> > Oh cool. So now all other packages using sdl-image and png (btw why is
> > criticalmass using png, is sdl-image not enough?) have to move to png3,
> > otherwise sdl-image is totally screwed up, again? Ok, thats what we wanted
> > anyhow, right?

>   I think that's true no matter what you do, if I've been following the
> discussion on -devel correctly.  Versioned symbols and stuff just make
> it less painful in the future.

Versioned symbols provide a clean upgrade path *now* for all package
sets that have not yet switched to libpng3.  But it requires package
maintainers to take advantage of it.

Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: pgp0epXst5qZ8.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: