Re: Shouldn't desktop environments use *term -ls? (Re: The best recommendation [...])
On Mon, 15 Jul 2002, Sam Hartman wrote:
> Brian> If this is the case, its not really a bug, more just
> Brian> another limitation in PAM. -- Brian May
>
> As PAM maintainer, I assert this is a bug ; the PAM mini-policy
So PAM setcred will now correctly append the PAM environment to the process
environment?
It would be good to have proper documentation on exactly WHEN one should
call every PAM hook, and also WHAT they do, and WHAT they do not do, as
well. Currently such information is either scattered inside the docs, or
missing.
--
"One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
Henrique Holschuh
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: