Re: FWD: C++ library packaging
Joey Hess <email@example.com> immo vero scripsit:
This reminded me of something,
we need this migration to gcc-3.1,
and in my impression, C programs are not
much of a problem because they seem to be binary
compatible (as far as I can tell from objdump outputs)
but C++ programs are very much different.
If C++ programs are going to require "g++3.1" embedded in
the shared library names Debian-wide, and
if we are going to propagate that change to upstream
authors, we might manage to do g++-3.1 transition
without having to do the "libwhatever<g>" treatment.
We need some discussion, and agreement, and announcement.
> I'm (re-)packaging some C++ libraries.
firstname.lastname@example.org : Junichi Uekawa http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
GPG Fingerprint : 17D6 120E 4455 1832 9423 7447 3059 BF92 CD37 56F4
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org