[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#150514: Uer maodifications _must_ bre preserved, even is a co-admin said otherwise a few releases ago



>>"Gordon" == Gordon Russell <gor@dcs.napier.ac.uk> writes:

 Gordon> Yes I agree that this seems in breach of Policy.

	Good. We agree there.

 Gordon> The Policy
 Gordon> also goes on to say something about not asking questions on
 Gordon> an upgrade.


 Gordon> I disagree with your philosophy that debian=multi-user and
 Gordon> thus system administration is an uncontrolled multi-user
 Gordon> activity.

	Yes, that is extremely silly,and I am glad I said nothing of
 the sort. 

 Gordon> This is not sensible as a procedure, and I will not go out of
 Gordon> my way to support uncontrolled system administration where
 Gordon> the administrators do not know what they are doing and do not
 Gordon> talk to each other.

	Of all the silly strawmen I have seen, this is the
 silliest. The point I was making was that in real world environments,
 when you have a few harried administrators, under heavy load, and too
 many machines to look after, perfect communication, and even perfect
 memory of what one did a few months ago on some machine is something
 that may not be reasonable to expect. You may live in an idealized
 world, but I suggest that Debian may not always be used in  a place
 called perfect. 


	Having said all that, I am also not sure whether my example is
 general enough to be relevant, but it certainly was not as silly as
 you were making it out to be.


 Gordon> To be honest there is a lot of truth is what you say, but I
 Gordon> am sure that the users will not want a debconf question every
 Gordon> time (can be done by setting priority high in the debconf
 Gordon> question).

	Users seem not to mind when dpkg asks them about conffiles
 from time to time, so where are you drawing this conclusion from?
 Indeed, I like the fact that sgpkg does ask me every time, and gives
 me the option to see a diff and choose, based on the changes made,
 whter or not to accept *this particular change*. 

	I think that for configuration file handling dpkg has set the
 gold standard that we ought to be emulating.

	manoj
-- 
 The more you sweat in peace, the less you bleed in war.
Manoj Srivastava   <srivasta@debian.org>  <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05  CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B  924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org



Reply to: