Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net> writes: [...] > < azeem> elmo_home: ok, well. What about those who already got a new key > signed and sent it to you? > < elmo_home> azeem: that's part of the post; basically, unless they've > done something like revoke their old key, the new key's not > going to be accepted.. there's no need to go weakening the web > of trust for no good reason Thats a bad thing. You must be able to add new keys. They should be properly signed like the ones needed for ID at NM stage, but then it should be *no* problem to add. Then it is not a "weakening" of the web of trust. Im waiting to get 0x7e7b8ac9 (1120d31b is broken. only sign stillworks) into the keyring, but no reply from keyring-maint yet. :( Thats bad, that is one of the most important positions in Debian, (without that nothing else works because everything relies on it) and if a person dont have the time for this he should give away the job or use some "Secretarys" so he only has to do the maintaining (but he should then do what this Secretarys say (if it is not s stupid thing)). -- begin OjE-ist-scheisse.txt bye, Joerg Encrypted Mail preferred! Registered Linux User #97793 @ http://counter.li.org end
Attachment:
pgpYT2cYmsQ7r.pgp
Description: PGP signature