Re: design of an apt-src program
Nicolai P Guba <email@example.com> writes:
> On Monday 17 June 2002 1:40 am, Joey Hess wrote:
> > 11. Support auto-rebuilds on upgrade?
> OOOH. This is a nice one :) How about managing custom source builds? That
> would rock ;)
common-lisp-controller ("c-l-c") already does this for Common Lisp
packages. (cmucl-source is the one that Joey mentioned. see also:
cclan.sf.net for non-debian packages that use it.) However, upgrading
a package causes all related source to be recompiled. E.g., upgrading
sbcl causes all the installed c-l-c-aware packages to be recompiled by
sbcl. Pretty nasty on a slow/overloaded box.
What would be neat is some decent way of managing which packages
should be auto-built by which compilers. Note that on my system I
currently have 4 CL compilers (plus 3 more that are not c-l-c-ized)
and over a dozen source packages. Also, there is an ugly
read-time-conditional (similar to #ifdef in C) that causes the
compilation to fail if a package that only works for cmucl is compiled
with a different compiler.
I have an idea of how to fix this issue, but it would be a CL-specific
solution (also depending on asdf, probably, for those who care).
-> -/ - Rahul Jain - \- <-
-> -\ http://linux.rice.edu/~rahul -=- mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org /- <-
-> -X "Structure is nothing if it is all you got. Skeletons spook X- <-
-> -/ people if [they] try to walk around on their own. I really \- <-
-> -\ wonder why XML does not." -- Erik Naggum, comp.lang.lisp /- <-
(c)1996-2002, All rights reserved. Disclaimer available upon request.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org