On Sat, 2002-06-08 at 09:17, Chris Lawrence wrote: > On Jun 08, Frank Copeland wrote: > > In my experience exim and postfix are both excellent MTAs. They share > > the very desirable property of not being sendmail. Configuring exim is > > not as straightforward as postfix, especially if you need to do > > something outside the scope of eximconfig. I would say that if you are > > familiar with postfix, you may as well go with postfix. It should be a > > drop in replacement for exim and no other package should notice the > > difference. > > postfix also has the markedly advantageous feature of having been > debconf-ized, while exim hasn't. > Well, yeh but thats relatively recent. And exim does have eximconfig which does work even if it isnt pretty. Cheers -- Rob 'robster' Bradford http://robster.org.uk
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part