Re: Uninstallable packages in woody
Previously Santiago Vila wrote:
> A few weeks ago I started to play with a poor's man dependency checker
> written in awk.
Why when we have already had such scanners running on a daily basis
for several years now?
> I believed this was never supposed to happen, since the scripts that
> create testing make sure that all dependencies may be met within testing.
Those scripts make sure things don't get worse, existing cruft from
potato still exists.
/firstname.lastname@example.org This space intentionally left occupied \
| email@example.com http://www.liacs.nl/~wichert/ |
| 1024D/2FA3BC2D 576E 100B 518D 2F16 36B0 2805 3CB8 9250 2FA3 BC2D |
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com