Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd

[tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)]

Adam Heath <doogie@debian.org> writes:

> Why not just answer my question?

It's been answered several times over.  You may not like the answers.
You mostly want to say "look, if you don't change FHS at all, then
there would be a place to put it".  

Jeroen was trying to say, I think, that if FHS said "put everything in
one directory", then this could also be made to work.  But it would be
a bad FHS.

Since none of these lists is the appropriate place to discuss what FHS
should be, it's totally off topic.

But you have gotten several answers to your question.  The answer is
not "because there is no place in FHS to put it", and you seem to only
want an answer of that form.  The fact that the answer is not of that
form does not, however, mean that you have not been given an answer.

And, to repeat:

This is not on topic for any of these mailing lists.
This is not on topic for any of these mailing lists.
This is not on topic for any of these mailing lists.
This is not on topic for any of these mailing lists.
This is not on topic for any of these mailing lists.
This is not on topic for any of these mailing lists.
This is not on topic for any of these mailing lists.
This is not on topic for any of these mailing lists.
This is not on topic for any of these mailing lists.


Thomas


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org