Re: hurd does NOT need /hurd
On Mon, 20 May 2002, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> Why do we need directories?
>
> Because it will be big mess without them.
>
> We have /hurd for more than 10 years, I haven't heard a single
> argument why we should remove it. Same goes for /libexec.
So, because it's been around for a full decade, that makes it right? This
kind of analogy can be applied to anything that has been around for a long
time.
Ie, is Windows 3.1 correct, because it has existed for well over a decade?
Why not just answer my question?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: