Re: possible mass-filing of bugs: many shared library packages contain binaries in usr/bin
On Mon, 2002-05-06 at 03:03, Jeroen Dekkers wrote:
> If those libraries can use the same binary then it should be in a
> seperate package. But if the binary is thightly bound to the library,
> then it should be in the same package (probably with a version number
> on it so you can install multiple versions of the same library).
In this case, maybe update-alternatives should be used, so multiple
versions of the library can be installed at once?
Brian May <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org