[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: possible mass-filing of bugs: many shared library packages contain binaries in usr/bin



On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 11:53:48PM +0900, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> Jeroen Dekkers <jeroen@dekkers.cx> immo vero scripsit:
> 
> > <list of packages>
> > 
> > The problem is that we don't have /libexec in Debian GNU/Linux (we do
> > in GNU/Hurd). I really think that's a bug and those binaries in these
> > library packages probably belong in /libexec.
> 
> No, most of them are just misplaced binary files.
> Having a /libexec is not related at all to the problem described here.

Of course it is, if they are only called by libraries (or other
binaries), they should be in /libexec instead of /bin. And I'm not
sure it's wrong to ship them in a library packages then.

Jeroen Dekkers
-- 
Jabber supporter - http://www.jabber.org Jabber ID: jdekkers@jabber.org
Debian GNU supporter - http://www.debian.org http://www.gnu.org
IRC: jeroen@openprojects

Attachment: pgp8KjCKm9YKi.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: