Re: 88 Priority violations in woody
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002 12:24:16 +0200
"Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis" <email@example.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 01:30:20AM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> > Yes, policy does say what you say it does. That's not at issue. However,
> > blindly filing bugs, without full understanding of the ramifications, will
> > very quickly get you severly larted.
> BTW bugs stand: we agree on the fact that they are policy violations, OTOH
> they are not RC. I'm not sure that they shold have been closed.
> IMHO we should handle them, in a different way though.
We really need to start working on them now, and get working on the next
release of Debian.
That's what "testing" is about, isn't it ?
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to firstname.lastname@example.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact email@example.com