[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: 88 Priority violations in woody

On Tue, 30 Apr 2002 12:24:16 +0200
"Luca - De Whiskey's - De Vitis" <luca@linuxasylum.net> wrote:

> Hi all,
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2002 at 01:30:20AM -0500, Adam Heath wrote:
> > Yes, policy does say what you say it does.  That's not at issue.  However,
> > blindly filing bugs, without full understanding of the ramifications, will
> > very quickly get you severly larted.
> BTW bugs stand: we agree on the fact that they are policy violations, OTOH
> they are not RC. I'm not sure that they shold have been closed.
> IMHO we should handle them, in a different way though.

We really need to start working on them now, and get working on the next
release of Debian.

That's what "testing" is about, isn't it ?
Quick release.


dancer@debian.org  http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer

To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to: