On Mon, 2002-04-29 at 15:13, Joey Hess wrote: > Santiago Vila wrote: > > Indeed, what we would need here is a version of debconf which works > > with the perl libraries in potato. Is that feasible? > > Well there's the one in potato, that works with the perl in potato. > There are few new package visible features and packages are supposed to > declare an appropriate versioned dep if they use them. > Hhhm, i think we can get away without debconf so long as people then install it later before the main dist-upgrade. Cheers -- Rob 'robster' Bradford http://robster.org.uk
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part