Re: RFC: Packaging buildd
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, Junichi Uekawa wrote:
> > Sort of. One could request it through the admin interface. The autobuilder
> > will only recompile something if it sees a need for it (for example, if I
> > upload a new version of a library that drops an old binary package and
> > adds a new one, then the autobuilder should rebuild all packages still
> > depending on the old package).
> Did you know that pbuilder is currently doing rebuilds ?
Yes, I have a FTBFS bug against one of my packages. :-)
> However, it seems like an interesting project if it ever gets finished.
> > > This might be useful is a build fails due to a Build-Dependent package
> > > not working, producing a broken deb. Thus you can just reschedule it
> > > once the dependency is fixed.
> > That's the plan, yes.
> That's generally a bad idea.
> Build-Depends needs to be updated.
Of course. He was referring to broken packages that were installed as
GPG public key available from http://phobos.fs.tum.de/pgp/Simon.Richter.asc
Fingerprint: 040E B5F7 84F1 4FBC CEAD ADC6 18A0 CC8D 5706 A4B4
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me into your ~/.signature to help me spread!
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org