Re: Why XFree86 4.2 Isn't in Woody

To: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>
Cc: debian-devel@lists.debian.org, debian-x@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Why XFree86 4.2 Isn't in Woody
From: tb@becket.net (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
Date: 16 Apr 2002 18:33:17 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 87g01v1542.fsf@becket.becket.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20020416190518.GM19375@blimpo.internal.net>
References: <[🔎] 20020416120106.GA18843@deadbeast.net> <[🔎] 20020416190518.GM19375@blimpo.internal.net>

Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org> writes:

> What the fuck is going on! When in this insane world did Branden become
> the polite well mannered one, and I become the asshole!

Uh oh, if we elect Branden DPL, is he going to switch back?


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- Why XFree86 4.2 Isn't in Woody
  - From: Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
- Re: Why XFree86 4.2 Isn't in Woody
  - From: Ben Collins <bcollins@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: XFree 4.2.0 - again
Next by Date: Re: ITP: libsocket++ - Socket abstraction library for C++
Previous by thread: Re: Why XFree86 4.2 Isn't in Woody
Next by thread: Re: Why XFree86 4.2 Isn't in Woody
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread