Re: GNU FDL (was Re: Bug#141561: gnu-standards: Non-free software in main)
On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 10:30:18AM -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 09:01, Richard Braakman wrote:
> > On the other hand, by taking action we might be able to stop those projects
> > from taking such a misguided course of action. I think the FSF is making
> > a big mistake with the GFDL.
>
> I'm curious about your reasoning. Have you posted it already? If not,
> maybe it would be good to hear once woody is out.
It participated in the discussion that raged on debian-legal a while ago.
I stated some points, but I never presented my opinion as a whole.
I felt that others were already making my points quite adequately,
and that's just the way a mailing list discussion works.
Now that the discussion has died down (awaiting a response from the FSF),
it might be worthwhile for me to summarize my position. If all the
participants did that and put it on a web page somewhere, it would be
a good introduction for people who missed the debate the first time
around. I haven't had the energy, though.
--
Richard Braakman
"I sense a disturbance in the force"
"As though millions of voices cried out, and ran apt-get."
(Anthony Towns about the Debian 3.0 release)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: