On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 12:22:00AM -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote: > On Mon, 2002-04-08 at 00:05, David Starner wrote: > > Where? Branden seems to believe that anything that Debian packages is > > software, for the purposes of the DFSG. [...] > In that thread in debian-legal, he seemed to accept the possibility that > some things packaged for Debian might not be software. His problem > seemed to be with corner cases, and wanting a good definition of > "software". I feel you are misrepresenting my position. http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2001/debian-legal-200112/msg00027.html "The Social Contract does not say: Debian Will Remain 100% Free Software and Some Other Things That Aren't Software But Which Are Also Free But Meet a Different Definition Of Free Than That Which Applies to Software, Plus Some Other Stuff That Isn't Free By Any Stretch Of The Imagination But Which We Thought Would Be Nice To Have." -- G. Branden Robinson | "I came, I saw, she conquered." Debian GNU/Linux | The original Latin seems to have branden@debian.org | been garbled. http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Robert Heinlein
Attachment:
pgpIpuDg9mVjW.pgp
Description: PGP signature