On Mon, Apr 08, 2002 at 10:30:18AM -0500, Jeff Licquia wrote: > > On the other hand, by taking action we might be able to stop those projects > > from taking such a misguided course of action. I think the FSF is making > > a big mistake with the GFDL. > > I'm curious about your reasoning. Have you posted it already? If not, > maybe it would be good to hear once woody is out. Jeff, you might want to read: http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/debian-legal-200202/msg00071.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/debian-legal-200202/msg00073.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/debian-legal-200202/msg00079.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/debian-legal-200202/msg00081.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/debian-legal-200202/msg00082.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/debian-legal-200202/msg00099.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/debian-legal-200202/msg00112.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/debian-legal-200202/msg00137.html http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2002/debian-legal-200202/msg00195.html People who want to opine about licensing issues really, really should subscribe to -legal. -- G. Branden Robinson | Debian GNU/Linux | Music is the brandy of the damned. branden@debian.org | -- George Bernard Shaw http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
pgp53caHrHKZM.pgp
Description: PGP signature