[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: on potato's proftpd



also sprach Andrew Pimlott <andrew@pimlott.net> [2002.04.03.1805 +0200]:
> On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 10:54:25AM -0500, Andrew Pimlott wrote:
> > I think Wichert's position
> 
> ... reflects appropriate discipline, given the (relatively modest)
> severity of the problem.

i also have to agree with you here since the problem isn't all that
bad after all. but it's not the problem which is making me react in
such "loud" ways, it's the principle of why a buggy package in s.d.o
doesn't get prioritized attention...

-- 
martin;              (greetings from the heart of the sun.)
  \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:"; net@madduck
  
printer not ready.
could be a fatal error.
have a pen handy?

Attachment: pgp0dTm9xGojn.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: