Re: ccache for the autobuilders?
On Tue, 2 Apr 2002 21:35, Anthony DeRobertis wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-04-02 at 11:17, Russell Coker wrote:
> > So we firstly need to find a real slow arch which also supports 4 new
> > large IDE disks (remember that machines 3 years old tend not to have good
> > support for >32G drives).
> That's primarily a BIOS problem, right? Does it matter for Linux?
One machine that I recently gave away never really supported more than 25G of
my hard drives. I never really investigated it properly, 25G was enough.
> > Then this same arch needs to be slow enough at CPU that it needs a
> > compiler cache, while being fast enough at doing disk IO and running the
> > file system to be able to offer a performance gain.
> DMA-based IDE is pretty fast. Nowhere near a good as SCSI, but you can't
> beat the price.
That's an arguement for another list.
If you send email to me or to a mailing list that I use which has >4 lines
of legalistic junk at the end then you are specifically authorizing me to do
whatever I wish with the message and all other messages from your domain, by
posting the message you agree that your long legalistic sig is void.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org