Re: preventing update of a custom package
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 01:26:52PM -0700, Joel Baker wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 11:51:44AM -0500, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> > If I'm not mistaken, that scheme is reserved for use by binary-only NMUs
> > (simple recompiles) for porting efforts. So while it is unlikely to clash,
> > it is not by any means guaranteed.
> *scratches head*
> Am I mistaken, then, in my reading of policy and the developer's reference
> that indicate one *should not* change the version, changelog, or anything
> else when doing a binary-only porting NMU?
Can you be more specific about the sections that you are referring to? I
don't think that policy mentions NMUs at all. Here is the relevant section
from the Developer's Reference:
If there is another section which contradicts this one, that should be
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org