Re: Packages file (long email) [WAS: Splitting Packages]
On Sun, Mar 31, 2002 at 12:53:38PM +0200, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto <fabbione@fabbione.net> was heard to say:
> The first thing that poped up to my eyes was the entry "Essential: yes"
> in bash
> Since there's already a priority structure why not use that? Having a
> priority
There are 25 packages which declare "Essential: yes" in sid.
Why change a fundamental part of the packaging system and risk
breaking things, merely to save about 350 bytes of disk space?
Daniel
--
/-------------------- Daniel Burrows <dburrows@debian.org> -------------------\
| Apostrophes are not a warning that a |
| word is about to end in an "s". |
\---- News without the $$ -- National Public Radio -- http://www.npr.org -----/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: