Re: Packages file [WAS: Splitting Packages]
On Sun, 31 Mar 2002, Otto Wyss wrote:
> > 1) where priority should include "essential"
>
> I like this since it solves the same purpose, a separate essiential
> line isn't necessary.
Well, no. The debian-policy explains the difference, read Section 2.2
("Priorities") and Section 2.3.7 ("Essential packages") to find out.
Jens
--
ruehmkorf at informatik dot uni hyphen koeln dot de
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-devel-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: