Re: Packages file [WAS: Splitting Packages]
On Sun, 31 Mar 2002, Otto Wyss wrote:
> > 1) where priority should include "essential"
> I like this since it solves the same purpose, a separate essiential
> line isn't necessary.
Well, no. The debian-policy explains the difference, read Section 2.2
("Priorities") and Section 2.3.7 ("Essential packages") to find out.
ruehmkorf at informatik dot uni hyphen koeln dot de
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to email@example.com
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact firstname.lastname@example.org